Hello, everyone! Today, we're diving into a detailed comparison of two leading security products: Kaspersky and Bitdefender. We'll be testing these products using a controlled environment with two virtual machines, subjecting them to a barrage of cyber attacks to determine which one offers superior protection.
Testing Setup
We have set up two virtual machines side by side: one running Bitdefender on the left and the other running Kaspersky on the right. We'll be hitting both systems with over 2,000 malware samples, ranging from ransomware to potentially unwanted programs (PUPs). The execution of these samples will be automated to ensure a fair and thorough test.
Execution and Initial Observations
As we initiate the tests, both Bitdefender and Kaspersky begin blocking malware samples. Bitdefender appears to have a slight head start in terms of speed, but this race is far from over. Both systems generate numerous alerts, indicating active blocking and behavioral detections. Bitdefender analyzes the attack chains and blocks them, while Kaspersky prevents cryptojacking attempts, showcasing its robust defense mechanisms.
Detection Rates
The competition is incredibly close, with Bitdefender achieving a detection rate of 97.4% and Kaspersky at 97.9%. These figures are too close to call, reflecting the high efficiency of both products. It's akin to watching a thrilling sports match, with the lead constantly changing between the two contenders.
Final Results
Upon completing the tests, Bitdefender recorded a detection rate of 96.8%, while Kaspersky posted 96.23%. Although Bitdefender displayed a perpetual installation progress bar reminiscent of Windows XP, this did not impact the overall results significantly.
Given the nature of our automated sample collection, there is a margin of error to consider. We did not manually verify each sample, which could include false positives. The detection ratio is based on what each product blocks from executing. It's possible for a product like Kaspersky to allow an application to run initially but block it based on its behavior.
Post-Test Analysis
After restarting both systems and conducting second-opinion scans and forensics, we observed the following:
- Bitdefender: Detected multiple temporary files and tracking cookies, but no serious threats or active malware.
- Kaspersky: Identified one detection in the temp folder and three other detections, with one actively running. This sample, part of an Enigma-protected application, was also flagged by Norton Power Eraser. Despite multiple detections due to its packing technique, the application did not exhibit malicious behavior when executed.
Conclusion
Both Kaspersky and Bitdefender performed exceptionally well, with no severe infections on either side. The key difference lies in their approach to detection:
- Kaspersky tends to allow more applications to execute and observes their behavior, making it potentially more lenient with uncommon or custom-coded applications.
- Bitdefender errs on the side of caution, blocking anything that could be potentially malicious.
In conclusion, both security products offer robust protection with slight variations in their methodologies. Your choice between Kaspersky and Bitdefender may depend on your specific needs and preferences regarding application execution and behavior monitoring.
No comments